资讯

The court, created as part of the United Nations in 1945, affirmed that countries must uphold existing international laws ...
The International Court of Justice issued a landmark advisory opinion in July 2025 declaring that all countries have a legal ...
A profound thread runs through the judgment and the separate opinion of one of the judges: that biodiversity is not merely a ...
The Court’s advisory opinion affirms that inadequate action on climate change may violate international law. Its findings could shape the contours of debate at COP30.
Amid geopolitical turmoil, the top court reaffirmed states’ legal duty to cut emissions. Read more at straitstimes.com. Read ...
LEGAZPI CITY – Former Albay lawmaker Joey Salceda hailed the recent historic advisory opinion from the International Court of ...
In a major move, the International Court of Justice has said countries must protect the environment and may be legally ...
The Manila Times on MSN11 小时Opinion

Fighting climate change now means fighting the US

Donald Trump’s position that climate change is “a hoax” is well-known, and just as he did when he took office in 2017, he ...
After the Paris Agreement came into effect in 2016, it was understood that the 1997 Kyoto Protocol had lost its legal relevance. However, the ICJ has now said that the treaty remains valid, and countr ...
Opinion
Inquirer Opinion on MSN6 小时Opinion

Addressing the biggest crisis of our time

The landmark Advisory Opinion on Climate Change by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) made it clear: Countries must comply with their climate obligations or face responsibility for ...
Trump's attack on climate policies go against the top court's opinion, which could be used by lawyers to fight back ...
President Donald Trump’s assault on clean energy regulations and funding has hit other parts of the climate NGO sector.